The rubric is the law.
It works to the criteria you defined, applied the same way to the first script and the three-hundredth.
Not because faculty stopped caring — because 300 scripts and 48 hours leave no room for the one thing that actually teaches: telling a student exactly where their thinking broke.
GunanQ gives that room back.
Every answer measured against your rubric — then held until a human signs off.
It carries the mechanical weight of assessment — every script, measured against your rubric, consistently. Then it stops and waits. Nothing reaches a student until a human presses Finalize.
It works to the criteria you defined, applied the same way to the first script and the three-hundredth.
Everything it produces is a proposal awaiting approval. You change what you disagree with, and it defers — every time.
Written guidance for a cohort of three hundred stops being arithmetic you cannot win.
Faculty see every exam and student with a live status against each name. Students see their whole record — with anything still under review clearly locked.
The hours GunanQ removes are not saved — they are redeployed into doubt sessions, remedial classes and research.
Still unsure? Ask us directly — a person answers.
No. GunanQ never publishes a mark on its own. Every assessment it produces is a proposal that a faculty member reviews, edits and finalizes. Until that happens, the student sees "Locked for Review".
Yes. GunanQ reads scanned handwritten scripts as well as typed submissions, which is what makes it usable for real end-semester examinations rather than only online quizzes.
Yours. GunanQ works to the rubric you define, applied identically to the first script and the three-hundredth. It does not bring an opinion of its own about what a good answer looks like.
More questions — data handling, moderation, integration, pricing — are answered on gunanq.com.
Everything above is the why. The product itself — documentation, security detail, pricing, sign-in and demo booking — lives at gunanq.com.